Publish cases, review results, and keep peer discussions close to the clinical context.
Clinical feed for physicians and mentors
Practice, results, and debriefs
VRM Clab — medical VR simulation and training
Clinicians publish results, ask questions, and discuss decisions after VR simulator sessions.
Cases, questions, and debriefs in one feedMetrics and results are available on the sitePeers discuss decisions and progress
How it works ↓Clinician pathFeed, case, and discussion side by side
01The clinician completes a clinical scenario in the simulator
02The site receives the result, questions, and comments
03The team compares decisions and continues the debrief
Clinical resultDebrief is available immediately after case publication
84% success rate0 critical errors18 peer comments
What the product is
VRM Clab turns clinical cases into a feed where every debrief can be studied, discussed, and compared
- 01Clinical case
A clinician completes a clinical case in the virtual reality simulator.
- 02Result on the site
After the session, the website shows the result, timeline, and key metrics.
- 03Debrief in the feed
The case becomes a post with context, questions, and notes for the team.
- 04Discussions
Peers and mentors comment on decisions and keep the takeaways visible.
Who it is for
For clinicians, mentors, and medical teams that need to compare results and return to debriefs
Review published cases, mark decisions, and leave clear comments for the team.
Compare group results, find weak points, and plan additional practice.
What you can do
Browse the feed, publish cases, ask questions, and discuss results after each session
The site shows session status, participant results, and clinical case context.
After the session, success rate, errors, time, and group comparison are visible.
A clinician can share a result, add context, and open the case for peers.
Peers and mentors comment on decisions, ask questions, and save takeaways.
Community
Case discussion, mentor comments, and a clear history for every result
A feed around clinical cases
Clinicians publish cases, mentors add comments, and the team sees which decisions worked and where more practice is needed.
Publish case
Peer discussions
Clinician path
Mentor: good approach, but instrument choice on the second step is worth discussing.Peer: we had a similar case last week, so we can compare group results.Author: added context and a short comment to the result.
Now in VRM Clab
Every session immediately becomes a case: the result, question, and mentor comment are already waiting in the feed
- Cardiology · scenario completed
84% success rate, 0 critical errors, case opened for the team.
- Mentor added a comment
Instrument choice on the second step and strong navigation were highlighted.
- Group compared the trajectory
The result is above median, and the next debrief is saved in the feed.
Before and after the session
Before VRM Clab, debriefs were split between notes and calls. Afterward, the team gets a case with metrics, takeaways, and group dynamics
scattered notescase with timeline
decisions, errors, and result stay together
debrief delayedfeedback right away
the mentor comments while context is fresh
progress unclear+12% vs group
dynamics are clear without manual spreadsheets
Classic debrief vs VRM Clab
Instead of a verbal recap, the team gets a saved record of every scenario
Next step: product
Ready to open your cases?
Create an account or sign in to open the feed, results, and discussions.